- Rule 36, Chapter II, Part VI of the BCI Rules
- An advocate shall not solicit work or advertise, directly or indirectly, by circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communications or interviews, nor through newspaper comments or photographs about cases. Breach can be professional misconduct under section 35 of the Advocates Act 1961.
- The 2008 website proviso
- A proviso to Rule 36 allows advocates to furnish website information as prescribed. Commentaries list the permitted particulars as name, address, contact details, enrolment number and date of enrolment, the Bar Council and Bar Association, professional and academic qualifications, and areas of practice.
- What not to put on the site
- Testimonials, success rates, case results, client lists, rankings and awards, “best lawyer” claims and promotional videos go beyond those particulars. In March 2025 the BCI issued a show cause notice to a law firm over a promotional video and condemned influencer endorsements.
- Entry notice on the website
- Many Indian law firm websites show a notice on entry saying the site is for information only, is not solicitation, and that the visitor accepts this before reading. It is a widespread practice rather than a rule text we could verify.
- Online platforms and social media
- The Madras High Court in 2024 cautioned against online platforms listing and promoting advocates, and the BCI issued cease-and-desist notices to such platforms. State Bar Councils, such as Delhi in 2025, have cautioned advocates against promotional social media.
- CNR number and eCourts
- Each case in courts on the eCourts system has a unique 16-character Case Number Record. Case status can be checked on the portal and app by CNR, party, advocate or filing number.
- GST on advocates’ services
- CBIC clarified in 2017 that legal services by an advocate or firm of advocates to a business entity fall under reverse charge, so the business client pays the GST. Services to individuals are treated differently.
- Privilege, confidentiality and the DPDP Act 2023
- Communications between advocate and client are protected by professional privilege under the evidence law (now the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023), and client details and documents are personal data under the DPDP Act 2023.